Unlike a real critic, I don’t have to go to movies I don’t think I’m going to like. I don’t have an editor assigning me films to review, nor do I feel the need to see everything, so I can warn the public–the members of which don’t listen to critics anyway–not to waste its hard-earned dime. Therefore, I can’t rightly call any list I might come up with “best-of,” because I have no idea if it’s true. Consequently, here are a few films released in 2007 that I liked, in alphabetical order:
Viggo Mortensen banishes the ghost of Aragorn past in this ferociously intense thriller from David Cronenberg. I’ve searched my head for a polite way to describe his character Nikolai; the words tough, enigmatic, hard-edged come to mind, but the term that keeps popping up is “bad-ass.” Mortensen invests every scene he’s in with danger and menace, and the expectation that something terrible might happen at any minute. He’s aided and abetted by Cronenberg’s taut direction, which combines with Peter Suschitzky’s cinematography and Carol Spier’s production design to produce an atmospheric, gritty mise en scène. But in the end, the movie belongs to Mortensen, who in an early scene nonchalantly cuts the fingers off a corpse, then puts a cigarette out on his own tongue. Now that’s bad-ass.
Joel and Ethan Coen’s film works on so many levels it’s scary; fortunately, it’s best considered as a whole. All departments work together seamlessly to support the brothers’ nihilistic vision. Take the acting: Josh Brolin’s Llewelyn Moss exudes working-class brio and vulnerability, and Javier Bardem’s Anton Chigurh is the embodiment of West Texas emptiness. Roger Deakins’ blown-out cinematography captures the soul-deadening heat of small towns like Odessa and Del Rio. It’s my considered opinion that the Coens were screwed in the ‘96 Oscars . . . who watches The English Patient any more? Fargo, on the other hand, has entered the national lexicon, it’s become part of the national zeitgeist. Maybe 2007 will be their year. (you can read my review of No Country for Old Men here).
Who knew that a micro-budgeted Irish musical could create such critical buzz, or appear on so many year-end lists? Yet director John Carney’s Once is the real deal. Shot on a high-def shoe-string, it doesn’t look like much, but features naturalistic performances from first-time actors Glen Hansard (the guy) and Markéta Irglová (the girl). He’s a street musician, she’s a classically-trained pianist, and Carney’s minimalist script develops their relationship organically, without any of the creaking plot machinery we see in more conventional films. There are no Obstacles placed in the way of our protagonists happiness, no trumped-up conflict to give the drama “weight.” Just a lilting narrative that encompasses and mirrors the fine songs written by Hansard (of the Irish band “The Frames”). Once is a sweet little drama that feels absolutely right, as if it could really happen that way.
Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Sweeney Todd is a Broadway musical adaptation by Tim Burton. No . . . really! And it’s pretty good, at that. He’s pared down Sondheim’s stage play so that it’s lean and mean, with no meat wasted. At the same time, it’s a truly cinematic experience, not simply a filmed stage play. His cast-led by Johnny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter-don’t have Broadway singing chops, but in a film, they’re not really needed. After all, you don’t have to project to the rafters night after night. Depp gives an fine, if rather one-note, performance, but it’s Bonham Carter who shines. She invests the meat-pie baroness Mrs. Lovett with a hilarious combination of wry cynicism and blasé nonchalance. The only misstep is the casting of Sacha Baron Cohen as Todd’s first victim-his performance is far too broad and self-conscious. That aside, Sweeney is a funny, appropriately over-the-top adaptation of an important musical.



































No Country – also really enjoyed the movie; not sure about the “west texas emptiness” comment – just because it’s a desert doesn’t mean it is empty.
Once – it was great! There was no pretense in the movie at all – just a story about two talented people who come together in their art for a while and then part.
Sweeney Todd – you know that I thought Johnny Depp really wasn’t up to the vocals, but I concur with your assessment of Bonham-Carter, she was able to show horror and humor, greed and compassion.
So? Some of us are adept at reviews, others of us prefer to have reviewers think for us. It is indeed novel, this business of reviewers who are cinemamateurs, rather than cold eyed, steely-worded, and polemic auteurs of correct pedagogy. (heh, heh I have no idea what I just said! It’s enough to make Mr. Olson ask, ” Why do some people who have so little to say have to say it so loudly?” )
Thanxxxxxxx! Early from Gold Beach
Hey, Earl … so you figured out the blog thing, eh? I’m definitely a cinemamateur, and my pedagogy certainly is incorrect.
Thanxxxxxxxx!
I’ve got to tell you. Based upon your thoughtful review of ONCE, Carolyn and I rented it [as opposed to waiting for EN-Flix]. Cozy in our love-seat, we found ourselves pulled into what is among the top cine-stories in our recent experience. On top of all else, everything the movie offered was above the belt! Thus, we were moved.
Tonight, we watched the Glen Ford version of the Elmore Leonard story, “3:10 to Yuma”. While this was an accidental receipt; we thought we were sneaking in an early chance at the recent release; it has reacquainted us with something we had forgotten. We’ll have to wait until our Thursday [PDT}.
Later,
Earl E. Wiz
I too loved ONCE … and the new version of 3:10 to Yuma. I caught the original on TV not all that long before the the new one’s release, and it really enhanced things to have the two to compare. Folks have complained about the ending of the new one, which is different from the original. Let me know what you think.
Rick,
While I profess not to have much to do with THE morality plays, passions, etc, you are aware of of my sorta-cultivated sense of humanitarianism. To be honest, I not only respect the entirety of the new version and the broader involvement of the distaff, the engaging moral sense of the ending is up with everything I experienced in theater; I do believe Shakespeare would approve of the entire revisiting to the screenplay. If Mr. Leonard felt that the 1950’s version was screwed up by Hollywood, it would be my hope that he would find the new version third dimensional, and with much less Brylecreme.
See you later, Carolyn, the kid, and I are sitting down to watch “Where The Green Ants Dream”.
Earl E.
Earl E.
http://www.godisnotelsewhere.blogspot.com/ has an interesting perspective on Sweeney Todd from a religious point of view. Check it out.