10,000 B.S.

Where’s Raquel Welch when you need her? I thought 10,000 B.C. was going to be a10000-bc.jpg remake of the Ray Harryhausen/ Raquel Welch pot-boiler One Million Years BC , but no. If Raquel had been around, it might at least have had some camp charm, but this new flick, directed by Roland Emmerich of Independence Day fame, is deadly serious. Make that deadly boring.

The film opens in the mountains of somewhere (we’re not sure, but I think it’s supposed to be in Africa) as a small band of hunter-gatherers begins to face the future that their woolly-mammoth prey–and thus their life style–is dwindling. An old seer is having a vision, and a young girl named Evolet stumbles into the proceedings. She’s the survivor of another tribe that’s been slaughtered by “four-legged demons.” The old woman prophesies that whoever kills the first mammoth of the last hunt will–stay with me now–get the white spear, wed Evolet, and defeat the four-legged demons.

Of course, complications ensue. Evolet grows up in love with D’leh, who’s not exactly the bravest bulb in the tribe, but when the last hunt comes along (don’t ask me how they know it’s the last one), he manages to kill the mammoth, get the white spear and the girl, and then turn around and lose them because he lied, or something. When the four-legged demons show up (they turn out to be men on horseback), they haul off the able-bodied men and the comely women (including Evolet), and D’leh sets off to follow them and bring back his one true love. In the course of his quest he’ll discover he’s the subject of not one, not two, but three separate prophecies, which lend a layer of portentous B.S. to the entire production.

Despite the ponderous plot, 10,000 B.C. is very pretty to look at. Although it’s supposed to take place in Africa, the scenes of D’let’s tribe were filmed in the mountains of New Zealand, and you almost expect Frodo to wander up, they look so much like the locations of a certain other film. Emmerich and cinematographer Ueli Steiger compose their wide-screen shots to take full advantage of all that scenery, and the impressive CGI effects are well-integrated into the real-life settings. The acting, by Camilla Belle as Evolet and Steven Strait as D’leh is ok, but come on now: their parts, especially the standard damsel-in-distress turn of the lovely Bell, could have been played by anyone. (Thanks to Yair Raveh for pointing out Bell’s resemblance to Lindsey Lohan.)

The problem with 10,000 B.C. is quite simply that it’s as dull as dishwater. Neither the direction nor the editing can conjure up enough urgency to make the endless chase exciting. We watch as our heroes battle big giant birds, big giant sabre-tooth cats and big giant slave traders, who look suspiciously like Arab terrorists. The man who gave us The Day After Tomorrow wouldn’t pander, would he?

After awhile, it all just becomes one big blur. I actually dozed off as our heroes were camped outside the bad guys’ pyramid-building operation (that’s right, I said “pyramid-building operation”) for what seemed to be 10,000 years. By the time we get to Egypt, and the climactic set-piece on a partially-built pyramid, we really don’t care what happens any more. Perhaps it should have been titled “10,000 Yawns.”

14 comments to 10,000 B.S.

  • I would expect nothing less from Emmerich. Next!

  • Rick

    Yeah, he’s pretty much a hack. But, at least “Independence Day” was entertaining. Or at least I was entertained.

    Thanks for the comment, Fletch.

  • Great review, Rick, but I’m actually looking forward to watching this when it comes out on DVD (which considering the reviews the theatrical run is getting should be sometime within the next 48 hours). It has “so bad it’s good” written all over it.

  • Rick

    “Plan 9 From Outer Space” is so bad it’s good, heck “One Million Years B.C.” is so bad it’s good, I’m afraid this movie’s just bad. But there’s one thing good about waiting for the DVD — you won’t spend a small fortune seeing it.

  • Yikes, thanks for taking the temp on this one. I was about a day away from seeing it before I caught the nasty buzz that it was as you described. Part of me is still tempted for the same reason as Rick Ryan, but I’ll wait for it on FX or something.

  • Hey, I find dishwater imminently fascinating. :)
    You know, Michael Bay is to Wal-Mart as Roland Emmerich is to K-Mart – neither of them contribute anything of real value, but if you had a choice, you’d choose the former.
    He won the box office, so some exec is sure to pony up another couple million for his next debacle.

  • Rick

    Indeed. Some of my best friends are dishwater.

    Agreed about Michael Bay, as well, although I’d only go to Wal-Mart marginally more willingly than K-Mart.

    The BIG question in all of this is where Target fits in. Is Brett Ratner to Target as Michael Bay is to Wal-Mart as Roland Emmerich is to K-Mart? Or merely Barry Sonnenfeld?

  • Brett Ratner is Big Lots.
    For Target I would pick Tony Scott. :)

    (there’s probably a pretty clever blog post in there somewhere)

  • she have a nice eyes

  • Angel

    hmm..i dont agree with your review. i saw the it when it first went into theatres and i LOVED it. but to each their own i guess

  • Rick

    That’s cool … to each their own indeed. Thanks for stopping by, Angel.

  • Izzy

    I totally disagree with this review. I thought 10,000 BC was an excellent film, and I didn’t get bored even once while watching. Maybe if you stopped looking for the bad and payed attention to the story you would have liked it too.

  • Rick

    Iz, probably not, but thanks for stopping by!

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>