<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There Goes Another One &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/03/31/weve-lost-another-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/03/31/weve-lost-another-one/</link>
	<description>film, media and religion from the banks of Coosa Creek</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/03/31/weve-lost-another-one/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=254#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Daniel, I don't think anybody knows what will work, short of People/Us-style tabloids.  It's really hard, I think, to do a balance, a blend if you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, I don&#8217;t think anybody knows what will work, short of People/Us-style tabloids.  It&#8217;s really hard, I think, to do a balance, a blend if you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/03/31/weve-lost-another-one/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=254#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Interesting development. I still subscribe to TIME, but they're certainly backsliding toward a tabloid, too, and they can't get any sense of how they want to redesign the magazine. I actually still get the NYT on Sundays, too, mostly because I really still do enjoy holding a paper or NYT Mag, if only for the sake of nostalgia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting development. I still subscribe to TIME, but they&#8217;re certainly backsliding toward a tabloid, too, and they can&#8217;t get any sense of how they want to redesign the magazine. I actually still get the NYT on Sundays, too, mostly because I really still do enjoy holding a paper or NYT Mag, if only for the sake of nostalgia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/03/31/weve-lost-another-one/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=254#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Not to mention, I believe, A.O. Scott.

Yeah, I had a professional discount too ... I just gradually kind of lost interest as the mag became weaker and weaker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention, I believe, A.O. Scott.</p>
<p>Yeah, I had a professional discount too &#8230; I just gradually kind of lost interest as the mag became weaker and weaker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/03/31/weve-lost-another-one/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=254#comment-296</guid>
		<description>I think it's a little disingenuious of Ansen to bemoan the fact that "anyone" can be a film critic today. In fact, some of our best-known print film critics, including Siskel and Ebert, were reporters who were drafted to fill the critic's role, and I'm sure Ansen has no small amount of respect for them.

I stopped subscribing to Newsweek (and I had a professional discount that made it practically free for me) when it went tabloid and news-lite in its coverage. I was particularly disturbed by the coverage of Andrew Cunanan's killing spree and the innuendos it made about the gay community. That was the final straw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a little disingenuious of Ansen to bemoan the fact that &#8220;anyone&#8221; can be a film critic today. In fact, some of our best-known print film critics, including Siskel and Ebert, were reporters who were drafted to fill the critic&#8217;s role, and I&#8217;m sure Ansen has no small amount of respect for them.</p>
<p>I stopped subscribing to Newsweek (and I had a professional discount that made it practically free for me) when it went tabloid and news-lite in its coverage. I was particularly disturbed by the coverage of Andrew Cunanan&#8217;s killing spree and the innuendos it made about the gay community. That was the final straw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
