<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Recent Notable DVDs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/</link>
	<description>Analysis and reviews of films from around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cinexcellence</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-10810</link>
		<dc:creator>Cinexcellence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-10810</guid>
		<description>Nice. :) I&#039;ve been wanting to see Vampyr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. <img src='http://coosacreek.org/mambo/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ve been wanting to see Vampyr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-10220</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-10220</guid>
		<description>Ditto.  Thanks for the pointer, Whitney!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto.  Thanks for the pointer, Whitney!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campanella.joseph</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-10080</link>
		<dc:creator>campanella.joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-10080</guid>
		<description>Whitney-

that&#039;s incredible! thanks so much for linking that here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whitney-</p>
<p>that&#8217;s incredible! thanks so much for linking that here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-10056</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-10056</guid>
		<description>Joe and Rick - have you guys read this guy&#039;s blog:

http://ericskillman.blogspot.com/

He does a lot of the graphic design for Criterion. The way he slaves over each aspect of an image is so interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe and Rick &#8211; have you guys read this guy&#8217;s blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://ericskillman.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ericskillman.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>He does a lot of the graphic design for Criterion. The way he slaves over each aspect of an image is so interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-10014</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-10014</guid>
		<description>Joe, you&#039;re absolutely right ... I much prefer the newer, more expressionistic Criterion covers

But for me it wouldn&#039;t be a double-dip, because I don&#039;t have the original. Hmmmm ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, you&#8217;re absolutely right &#8230; I much prefer the newer, more expressionistic Criterion covers</p>
<p>But for me it wouldn&#8217;t be a double-dip, because I don&#8217;t have the original. Hmmmm &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Campanella</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-9946</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Campanella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-9946</guid>
		<description>Also Rick. And I don&#039;t know how much this means to you, but for me, the cover art is so greatly improved it&#039;s almost worth the double dip based on packaging alone!

EH...
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51XHQ6Z3PSL._SL500_AA240_.jpg

AWESOME...
http://www.nipponcinema.com/images/releases/high_and_low_criterion.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Rick. And I don&#8217;t know how much this means to you, but for me, the cover art is so greatly improved it&#8217;s almost worth the double dip based on packaging alone!</p>
<p>EH&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51XHQ6Z3PSL._SL500_AA240_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51XHQ6Z3PSL._SL500_AA240_.jpg</a></p>
<p>AWESOME&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.nipponcinema.com/images/releases/high_and_low_criterion.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.nipponcinema.com/images/releases/high_and_low_criterion.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-9935</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-9935</guid>
		<description>I think the one I saw -- Criterion&#039;s original transfer, number 24 in their series, which meant an early one -- was direct from their Laser Disk.  It was non-anamorphic, and bare-bones.  There have been significant advances in digital &quot;restoration&quot; since then (1998), and there may have been new elements found.  Folks who&#039;ve seen it say it&#039;s a major improvement.  I&#039;d love to own it, and probably will at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the one I saw &#8212; Criterion&#8217;s original transfer, number 24 in their series, which meant an early one &#8212; was direct from their Laser Disk.  It was non-anamorphic, and bare-bones.  There have been significant advances in digital &#8220;restoration&#8221; since then (1998), and there may have been new elements found.  Folks who&#8217;ve seen it say it&#8217;s a major improvement.  I&#8217;d love to own it, and probably will at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whitney</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-9827</link>
		<dc:creator>Whitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-9827</guid>
		<description>High and Low is one of my favorite Kurosawa movies. It&#039;s so dark. Probably his darkest? But I remember the print I watched on DVD being pretty beautiful already? Maybe my memory is rosy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High and Low is one of my favorite Kurosawa movies. It&#8217;s so dark. Probably his darkest? But I remember the print I watched on DVD being pretty beautiful already? Maybe my memory is rosy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-9581</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-9581</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true: &quot;Vampyr&quot; isn&#039;t as easy to love as &quot;The Passion of Joan of Arc.&quot;  But I&#039;d give it another shot.  I think it&#039;s monumentally creepy, but in a fundamentally different way from most ghost stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true: &#8220;Vampyr&#8221; isn&#8217;t as easy to love as &#8220;The Passion of Joan of Arc.&#8221;  But I&#8217;d give it another shot.  I think it&#8217;s monumentally creepy, but in a fundamentally different way from most ghost stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campanella.joseph</title>
		<link>http://coosacreek.org/mambo/2008/07/25/some-recent-notable-dvds/comment-page-1/#comment-9490</link>
		<dc:creator>campanella.joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coosacreek.org/mambo/?p=655#comment-9490</guid>
		<description>Never seen a Tarr movie, which I plan do very, very soon.

HIGH AND LOW is great. Not his best, like you say Rick, but what the hell. Even his worst is better than everyone else!

VAMPYR didn&#039;t do it for me the first time I saw it. I don&#039;t know why. I&#039;ve seen parts of DAY OF WRATH that floored me, and PASSION is just one of the greatest films ever. Maybe I need to give it another go. Eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never seen a Tarr movie, which I plan do very, very soon.</p>
<p>HIGH AND LOW is great. Not his best, like you say Rick, but what the hell. Even his worst is better than everyone else!</p>
<p>VAMPYR didn&#8217;t do it for me the first time I saw it. I don&#8217;t know why. I&#8217;ve seen parts of DAY OF WRATH that floored me, and PASSION is just one of the greatest films ever. Maybe I need to give it another go. Eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
